Two planes, but three buildings went down in the World Trade Center.
- WTC 1 (North Tower)
- WTC 2 (South Tower)
- WTC 7 (Building 7)
Here is some footage about how WTC 7 went down:
No planes got anywhere near WTC 7, so what happened?
The official reason given for the collapse of WTC 7 was that debris had fallen from the towers, had damaged the structure of the building, and had started fires as well. When that explanation didn't work, they changed it, and said that the building had to be "pulled". By "pulled" they mean controlled demolition.
Here is the same footage comparing the collapse of WTC 7 alongside a building that is brought down by controlled demolition.
That's the same right?
"Pulling" a building however (so that it falls into its own footprint) requires weeks (maybe even months) of preparation, and is certainly not something you can do in less than say an hour when the building is on fire, and there is complete chaos everywhere.
Those explosives must have been planted there ages ago by people with the right security access to WTC 7.
Conclusion: 9/11 was an inside job.
There were a number of things that the USA got out destroying their own towers.
- Wildcard for war on terror (the US government points somewhere, says "terrorists", and off they go)
- Sympathy from around the world
- Patriot Act
- Martial Law
- Phone tapping
- Google tapping
- People are scared, and are prepared to give up their freedom
And much, much more...
9/11 was only the beginning.
A plane cannot fly faster than its designed maximum operating speed (Vmo). Any faster and the plane will literally fall apart (as it has done so in the past with other aviation accidents).
Planes were shown, based on the provided radar speeds, to be flying in excess of 100 mph faster than the designed maximum speed.
This is impossible, but please don't take my word for it:
The manufacturer of both aircraft, Boeing, confirms that those type of aircraft cannot fly at those kind of speeds at 700 feet. It's physically impossible. The aircraft engines simply won't be able to provide enough trust to overcome that kind of drag at those speeds.
John Lear, a veteran pilot with 19,000 hours, has created a sworn affidavit about the 9/11 planes, and the speeds they were flying at.
Here are some of the highlights:
- John Lear has some 19,000 flying hours, mostly as captain or as an instructor on planes with 3 or 4 engines.
- No Boeing 767 airliners hit the Twin Towers as fraudulently alleged by the government, media, NIST and its contractors.
- When and if the nose of an airplane came in contact with the buildings 14 inch by 14 inch steel box columns and then, 37 feet beyond, the steel box columns of the building core the momentum of the wings would have slowed drastically depriving them of the energy to penetrate the exterior steel box columns.
- The argument that the energy of the mass of the Boeing 767 at a speed of 540 mph fails because: a) No Boeing 767 could attain that speed at 1000 feet above sea level because of parasite drag which doubles with velocity and parasite power which cubes with velocity. b) The fan portion of the engine is not designed to accept the volume of dense air at that altitude and speed.
- My opinion, based on extensive flight experience both as captain and instructor in large 3 and 4 engine aircraft is that it would have been impossible for an alleged hijacker with little or no time in the Boeing 767 to have taken over, then flown a Boeing 767 at high speed, descending to below 1000 feet above mean sea level and flown a course to impact the twin towers at high speed
- Even on a clear day a novice pilot would be wholly incapable of taking control and turning a Boeing 767 towards New York because of his total lack of experience and situational awareness under these conditions. The alleged hijackers were not 'instrument rated' and controlled high altitude flight requires experience in constantly referring to and cross-checking attitude, altitude and speed instruments. Using the distant horizon to fly 'visually' under controlled conditions is virtually impossible particularly at the cruising speed of the Boeing 767 of .80 Mach.
- Its takes a highly skilled pilot to interpret the "EFIS" (Electronic Flight Instrument Display) display, with which none of the hijacker pilots would have been familiar or received training on, and use his controls, including the ailerons, rudder, elevators, spoilers and throttles to effect, control and maintain a descent. The Boeing 767 does not fly itself nor does it automatically correct any misuse of the controls.
- That an alleged hijacker could overcome all of these difficulties and hit a 208 foot wide building dead center at the north tower and 23 feet east of dead center at the south tower is simply not possible. At the peak of my proficiency as a pilot I know that I could not have done it on the first pass. And for two alleged hijackers, with limited experience to have hit the twin towers dead center on September 11, 2001 is total fiction. It could not happen.
- No Boeing 767 airliner(s) exceeded 500 mph in level flight at approximately 1000 feet on 9/11 as fraudulently alleged by the government, media, NIST and its contractors because they are incapable of such speeds at low altitude.
- To propose that a Boeing 767 airliner exceeded its designed limit speed of 360 knots by 127 mph to fly through the air at 540 mph is simply not possible. It is not possible because of the thrust required and it's not possible because of the engine fan design which precludes accepting the amount of dense air being forced into it.
The most experienced hijack pilot, could not land a Cessna 152 two weeks before 9/11. In my opinion there was simply no way they could have hijacked those planes, and flew them in the towers dead-center.
Given the radar speeds, maybe they used missiles with wings?!? Using pre-programmed computer software to fly them directly (and accurately) into the towers?!? I'm not convinced it was done this way by the way - just thinking out loud.
Either way, the government has provided false data with regards to the planes that supposedly crashed into the two towers. Airliners don't fly that fast at sea level.
Plane crash physics
Airliners don't meld into steel and concrete buildings, they crash against them!
- Joseph Keith (retired Aerospace Engineer)
It's just one big joke. Planes are mostly made out of Aluminium, and are fragile. They damage easy.
Throwing a coke can against a brick wall, will give you some idea of the physics involved. Or firing a bullet (high density) into a concrete wall. There's just no way the planes were absorbed by the towers in their entirety. They would have literally crashed against the building and its steel columns.
In fact, that's what the towers were designed for.
Speaking of weird science, when the planes hit the towers, they didn't slow down at all. This is in direct conflict with Isaac Newton's laws.
What happened in Shanksville?
Where is the plane? Where are the bodies?
What happened in the Pentagon?
Where is the plane? Where are the bodies?
This is a good video with lots of good information, but it's 40 minutes. Just letting you know.
Where did the towers go?
The rubble pile should be at least 1/8 of the original building height (12.5%).
- Dr Judy Wood
You can easily verify that this is true, by looking at the PGC building in Christchurch, New Zealand after an earthquake.
The rubble pile was no more than 2% of the original building height.
- Dr Judy Wood
Now, look at the rubble from WTC 1 and WTC 2. There's nothing there.
It just pulverized in plain sight:
Most of the building is just gone. No steel columns, no bodies, no toilet bowls (apparently they are hard to destroy, and should have been there), etc.
Just one big dust cloud.
It looks like another controlled demolition doesn't it (the whole building came down in freefall)? Keep in mind that the US military is anywhere between 20-30 years ahead of what we see today. Dr Judy Wood picked up on this as well in her book "Where did the towers go?", and went as far as to suggest directed energy weapons.
One of the things that didn't get pulverized, was a passport from one of the terrorists 'proving' it was a terrorist attack. How convenient.
There's so much more to 9/11 that leads to the conclusion it was an inside job. Here's a brief overview.
The BBC knew ahead of time WTC 7 was going to fall, and announced it 20 minutes too early!
Some of the people that were being interviewed were actors. The Harley Guy is probably the best example of this, but the newsreader who just "happened" to be there, and figured out it was Osama Bin Laden scores quite high too.
Someone figured out how to fold a $20 USD bill into a reflection of the twin towers. Who on Earth would figure that out?
Molten steel - really?!? Kerosene doesn't get that hot for that to happen.
Some 1,400 cars around the twin towers were all "toasted". Now what could possibly cause that?
On 9/11 there was a major military exercise, that created an enormous amount of confusion.
The planes flew into radar gaps, turned the transponder off, turned around, and flew to New York. This would have required knowledge of these radar gaps.
Some of the supposed hijackers were still alive after the event. Oops.
Most of the hijackers were from Saudi-Arabia. Why are we in Afghanistan/Iraq again?!?
Most people know that the all-seeing eye is an occult symbol for satan.
And here it is again. Wake up people.
Speaking of evil:
Thousands, and thousands, have died to make this 'joke' happen.
If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.
There's so much that simply doesn't add up with 9/11, so much disinformation around it, but when I get stuck trying to figure out what exactly has happened, I just remind myself that WTC 7 was a controlled demolition, and therefore that 9/11 was an inside job.
For more information on Building 7 check out the Remember Building 7 website.